1 · You were probably told the world is hard
That there is not enough to go around. That suffering is the unavoidable cost of a world that works. That someone always has to lose. It is the oldest story we tell, and it is the one thing the numbers on the main page contradict, line by line, with a citation under each: the planet grows about 1.4× the calories a person needs, carries 287× the renewable water, generates several times the electricity, and produces roughly $13,000 of output per person per year against an extreme-poverty line of about $3 a day. The hunger, the thirst, the untreated illness — these are not production failures. They are distribution outcomes. Which means they were never laws of nature. They were always choices.
2 · It costs less than you have been told
The number that ends most of these conversations is "we can't afford it." Here is the arithmetic, fully shown on the methodology page:
Lifting every human on Earth to a $3/day floor would cost about $8.98 trillion a year — 8.2% of world GDP. And that is the expensive way to count it, because most poor people are not at zero. Paying only the gap — the difference between what people have and the line — costs well under $1 trillion a year: roughly a single year's increase in global military spending.
For scale: world military spending reached $2.7 trillion in 2024 (its tenth consecutive annual rise), and $213.8 trillion in wealth is held by the 58 million people worth more than a million dollars. Gabriel Zucman's 2024 report for the G20 estimates that a 2% minimum tax on the world's ~3,000 billionaires would raise $200–250 billion a year on its own. The money to end the worst of it is not missing. It is parked.
And there is a quieter fact from economics: a dollar does not buy the same amount of life everywhere. To someone living on $3 a day, an extra dollar is medicine, a school day, a meal. To a billion-dollar balance sheet, the same dollar is a rounding error. Moving it from where it does nothing to where it does everything is not a loss. It is the highest-return transaction that exists.
3 · You would not be the first — and the first are remembered
The most powerful argument is not a guilt trip. It is a guest list. Some of the people most capable of keeping everything chose, instead, to give it to the world — and history did not record them as fools. It recorded them as the ones who got it right.
They sold the insulin patent for one dollar
In 1923 Frederick Banting, Charles Best, and James Collip each sold their share of the insulin patent to the University of Toronto for $1, so the hormone could not be monopolized and could be made widely under quality control. (Honestly: the famous line "insulin belongs to the world" is almost certainly apocryphal — trust the deed, not the quote. And the deed alone didn't hold; a century on, insulin pricing is one of the cleanest cases of manufactured scarcity on the main page. Giving the patent away mattered. It just wasn't enough by itself.)
Source: Snopes — the $1 patent (and the apocryphal quote) · Banting House NHS
"Could you patent the sun?"
On 12 April 1955, the day the polio vaccine was declared safe, Edward R. Murrow asked Jonas Salk on CBS who owned the patent:
"Well, the people, I would say. There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?" — Jonas Salk
There was no patent, and the vaccine went to manufacturers without royalty. (In fairness, the foundation's lawyers had already judged it likely unpatentable — so the precise claim is "there was no patent," not "he locked away a fortune and threw away the key." It is the sentiment that endured.)
Source: Democracy Now! — transcript of the Murrow exchange
"The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced"
Andrew Carnegie wrote that in The Gospel of Wealth (1889), arguing the rich are only trustees of their fortune; he then funded 2,509 public libraries. The caveat belongs right here, in plain sight: three years later his manager broke the Homestead strike with armed Pinkertons and gutted the union. Philanthropy is not absolution. But the libraries are still open — and "dies disgraced" is the line history kept.
Source: Carnegie Corporation — The Gospel of Wealth (full text)
He died with almost nothing, on purpose
Chuck Feeney gave away more than $8 billion through The Atlantic Philanthropies — much of it anonymously — and died in 2023 having kept only a modest amount for himself. His phrase for it was Giving While Living:
"I cannot think of a more personally rewarding and appropriate use of wealth than to give while one is living." — Chuck Feeney
Source: The Atlantic Philanthropies
"Earth is now our only shareholder"
In September 2022 Yvon Chouinard gave away Patagonia — transferring the company to a trust and a nonprofit so roughly $100 million a year in profit funds climate work instead of enriching owners.
"Instead of extracting value from nature… we are using the wealth Patagonia creates to protect the source. We're making Earth our only shareholder." — Yvon Chouinard
(Candidly: the structure was also tax-efficient and the family kept board control — but the profit really does leave the family, for the planet.)
Source: Patagonia Works — press release
And you would not be alone. More than 250 of the world's wealthiest people, across 31 countries, have signed the Giving Pledge to give away most of their fortunes. (It's non-binding and self-reported, and several have grown richer faster than they've given — so a signature is an intention, not a delivery. Intentions still beat their absence, and a kept one beats everything.)
4 · A fairer world is better — for you too
This is the part that surprises people. Reducing the distance between the top and the bottom does not only help the bottom. The evidence is that it lifts the whole society, including the people at the top of it.
More equal places are better to live in — at every income
Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, comparing the richest two dozen countries and the 50 US states (The Spirit Level, 2009), found that more unequal rich societies do worse across the board — physical and mental health, violence, imprisonment, social mobility — and that the harm reaches up the income ladder, not just along the bottom of it:
"More unequal societies are bad for almost everyone within them — the well-off as well as the poor." — Wilkinson & Pickett
(Honestly: these are cross-country correlations, and critics argue they shift with which countries you include. Treat it as a strong association, not proof. It still points one way.)
Source: The Equality Trust — The Spirit Level
Past a point, more money stops buying much more life
A dollar is not worth the same to everyone. Layard, Mayraz and Nickell (2008), across 50+ countries, estimated that each additional percent of income adds about the same wellbeing regardless of where you start — which means a dollar does vastly more good at $3 a day than on a billion-dollar balance sheet. The money-and-happiness research (Kahneman & Deaton 2010; Killingsworth 2021; their joint 2023 reconciliation) refined the old "$75,000 plateau": money keeps helping, but with steeply diminishing returns. The marginal dollar you would not notice is, somewhere else, a life.
Source: Layard, Mayraz & Nickell (LSE CEP) · Kahneman & Deaton (PNAS)
Inequality quietly corrodes the trust everyone lives on
Eric Uslaner found economic equality to be the single strongest predictor of whether people trust one another at all; Oishi, Kesebir and Diener (2011) found Americans were, on average, happier in the years when inequality was lower — through perceived fairness and trust. Gated communities and private security are what you buy when the shared fabric frays. A fairer society is a less anxious one to be wealthy in.
Source: Oishi, Kesebir & Diener (Psychological Science) · Uslaner, The Moral Foundations of Trust
The people who got there are already saying it
You don't have to take it from us. In 2011 Warren Buffett wrote that he paid a lower federal tax rate — 17.4% — than anyone else in his office, and asked to be taxed more. Ahead of Davos 2024, 260 millionaires and billionaires from 17 countries signed an open letter, Proud to Pay More:
"Our request is simple: we ask you to tax us, the very richest in society. This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations' economic growth." — Proud to Pay More (2024)
Source: Buffett, "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich" · Proud to Pay More
5 · You are not the villain in this story
In Ursula K. Le Guin's The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, a whole city's happiness rests on one child's suffering in a basement, and every citizen is told the bargain is necessary. The main page asks the empirical question the story leaves open: is the suffering actually load-bearing? Does the comfort of the few require the misery of the many?
Every well-designed test we have — the cash-transfer pilots, the eleven countries that chose differently — gives the same answer: no. When the suffering is lifted, the predicted collapse does not come. The basement was never holding up the city.
Which means something gentle and enormous at once: you did not build the basement, and you are not required to keep its door shut. The system handed you a role in a story that insists someone must lose. The data says the story is false. You are not the villain. But you may be one of the very few people alive with a hand on the latch.
7 · The division is done
That is the whole of it. We did the arithmetic so the "we can't" would stop being a fact and start being a decision. Everything on this site is in the public domain — take it, check it, try to disprove it. If a number is wrong, tell us and we will fix it. If it is right, then what remains is not an accounting problem.
The ones who walked away from Omelas left in the dark, alone, toward a place Le Guin could not describe. You have an easier road than they did: you can see exactly where it goes, it is cheaper than you feared, and you would be in good company. The world already produces enough. The only open question is whether it reaches everyone — and that part, finally, is a choice.
Read the evidence: the arithmetic · eleven countries that chose differently · methodology & honest limits · the full literature.
8 · Pass it on
If any of this landed, the most useful thing you can do is hand it to someone with the power to act — or someone who needs to believe it is possible. It is public domain; no permission required, no attribution needed, no strings.
Email it · Bluesky · Reddit · Copy link ✓ copied
These are plain links — no buttons phone home, no scripts load from anyone else, nothing tracks the click. Same as the rest of the site.